Super-emitters and persistent source regions.

The Bucharest landfills were SMART-CH4's stress test: can independent satellite systems agree on what a single facility emits?

Bucharest: a landfill and its paperwork

The Vidra landfill (44.314°N, 26.127°E) — referred to as “Sintești” in some project documents, after the neighbouring village; same landfill — is SMART-CH4's single most legible result.

Hyperspectral imagery was processed with the HiFi retrieval package — three independent methods (Physics-Forward, Principal Component Analysis, Matched Filter) — followed by a cross-sectional flux quantification. Of 22 archived overpasses (9 EnMAP, 13 EMIT, 3 PRISMA), cloud cover left a usable subset in which 11 plumes were detected, yielding three emission estimates for Vidra.

Eleven hyperspectral methane plume retrievals over the Vidra landfill from EMIT, EnMAP and PRISMA between March 2024 and September 2025, each panel showing the enhanced XCH4 concentration in ppm with wind speed and viewing geometry annotated; panels suitable for emission-rate estimation are marked.
The eleven usable overpasses (EMIT, EnMAP, PRISMA) showing the methane plume over the Vidra landfill, March 2024 – September 2025.
SourceEstimate
EnMAP, EMIT, PRISMA (this study)1–3 t/h
GHGSatbroadly consistent
Carbon Mapper (EMIT and Tanager)broadly consistent
E-PRTR official report~0.05 t/h (≈470 t/yr)

Independent instruments, independent teams, independent retrieval methods — converging on roughly one to three tonnes per hour. The facility's official filing to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register is around forty times lower. The satellite estimates agree far better with EDGAR (which uses pre-2018 E-PRTR figures) than with what the facility reports today.

Time series of Vidra landfill methane emission rate estimates in tonnes per hour from Carbon Mapper (EMIT, Tanager), IUP (EMIT, EnMAP) and GHGSat between January 2024 and mid-2025, with dashed reference lines for the measurement mean, EDGAR, and the E-PRTR official filing.
Vidra landfill emission-rate estimates from five independent satellite systems across 2024–2025, against the measurement mean, EDGAR and the official E-PRTR filing.

Alongside this, SRON's machine-learning pipeline found 15 TROPOMI plumes near Bucharest between October 2018 and September 2024, and identified two persistent long-term hotspots in the area — landfills being the most likely cause of both. The neighbouring Glina landfill showed no detectable plume in any available scene. Cloud cover was the limiting factor throughout: this is a result won from a small number of clear-sky opportunities.

MethaneSAT ceased operations in June 2025 after contact was lost; its archive of ~1,400 acquisitions from May 2024–June 2025 remains open to registered scientific users. Around 15 collections cover Romania, mostly cloud-contaminated; emissions from the Bucharest landfills are visible in one target.

217 persistent methane source regions (IUP Bremen) [TN2 §3.1.1]

An automated algorithm applied to four years of TROPOMI/WFMD data (2018–2021) identified 217 “potential persistent source regions” worldwide — places where methane is reliably elevated, not just occasionally. Classified against EDGAR v6.0, GFEI v2.0 and WetCHARTs v1.3.1:

World map of the potential persistent methane source regions (PPSRs) detected from four years of TROPOMI/WFMD data, 2018-2021, plotted as circles coloured by dominant attributed source (coal, oil and gas, other anthropogenic, wetland, or unknown) and sized by emission magnitude from 0.2 to 2.0 megatonnes per year; ten of the largest regions are numbered, including the Sudd wetland in South Sudan.
The potential persistent source regions detected worldwide from TROPOMI/WFMD, 2018–2021 (PHD v1.0). Circle colour marks the dominant attributed source, circle size the emission magnitude; the ten largest regions are numbered — 1 is the Sudd wetland, South Sudan.
Dominant sourceShare of PPSRs
Other anthropogenic (landfills, agriculture)30.4%
Coal7.8%
Oil and gas7.8%
Wetlands7.3%
Unknown46.5%

Nearly half could not be attributed to any known source at all. That is itself a finding.

Stacked histogram of methane emission estimates for the 217 potential persistent source regions, coloured by dominant source category, with a cumulative distribution curve on a secondary axis showing that most regions emit under 0.5 megatonnes per year while a long tail extends out to about 4.5 megatonnes per year.
Emission-size distribution across all 217 PPSRs (bars, left axis; coloured by dominant source) and the cumulative distribution (blue line, right axis). Most regions are small — under 0.5 Mt/yr — but a long tail of larger, mostly wetland-dominated regions reaches out to about 4.5 Mt/yr, which is where the Sudd sits.

And the wetlands are enormous. The largest PPSR on Earth is the Sudd wetland in South Sudan:

SourceEstimate for the Sudd
This study (TROPOMI)4.5 ± 0.9 Mt/yr
WetCHARTs v1.3.10.88 Mt/yr
EDGAR v6.00.17 Mt/yr
GFEI v2.00.01 Mt/yr
Seven-panel figure on the Sudd wetland, South Sudan. Panel a: map of TROPOMI XCH4 enhancement with the PPSR boundary outlined. Panels b-d: 2018-2022 time series of the retrieved emission rate (4.5 plus or minus 0.9 megatonnes per year), the XCH4 enhancement, and wind speed, each with their year-to-year standard deviation. Panels e-g: gridded 2018-2019 methane emission maps over the same region from WetCHARTs v1.3.1, EDGAR v6.0 and GFEI v2.0, each far fainter than the satellite-observed enhancement in panel a.
The Sudd wetland, PPSR 1. (a) TROPOMI XCH4 enhancement with the PPSR boundary outlined. (b–d) 2018–2022 time series of the retrieved emission rate, the XCH4 enhancement and wind speed — the emission estimate is stable from year to year (E = 4.5 ± 0.9 Mt/yr, with an inter-annual spread σ(E) of 3.7 Mt/yr). (e–g) The same region in WetCHARTs v1.3.1, EDGAR v6.0 and GFEI v2.0 — all three inventories show far less emission than TROPOMI observes.

Even accounting for non-wetland emissions the satellite estimate likely also picks up in this region, the hotspot analysis is roughly five times what state-of-the-art emission datasets predict for the Sudd. Combined with a neighbouring region, the total (5.3 ± 1.3 Mt/yr) agrees with independent published estimates. The Iberá wetland in Argentina — the third-largest PPSR — tells the same story: 3.3 ± 1.1 Mt/yr observed against 0.64 Mt/yr in WetCHARTs, again roughly five times. Across every wetland-dominated PPSR, the satellite estimate exceeds the inventory, usually by a large factor.

Published as Vanselow et al., ACP, 24, 10441, 2024 (doi:10.5194/acp-24-10441-2024).

Machine learning for plume quantification (SRON) [TN2 §3.1.2, FR]

SRON detects methane plumes in TROPOMI daily — 2,297 large plumes in 2023 alone, categorised by likely source. Quantifying them has relied on the Integrated Mass Enhancement (IME) method, which carries a known wind-speed-dependent bias.

ML-SPERE, a convolutional network trained on simulated TROPOMI plumes (with wind, surface pressure, pixel size and a plume mask as extra channels), outperforms IME on held-out synthetic plumes and removes the wind-speed bias — particularly below 2 m/s, which matters because the detection pipeline over-represents low-wind scenes (they are easier to see). Applied to a well-studied blowout in Kazakhstan, it agrees better with inverse modelling and high-resolution satellites than TROPOMI IME does. Applied to all 2021 detections, sectoral averages are largely unchanged — the correction is in the individual estimates, not the totals. Paper submitted to AMT.

Plume detection datasets for 2021 and 2023 have been released. (The two years use different pipelines and should not be compared for trends.)